LPC Home Express Home News Home Archives Contact Us

 

 

Sexuality club explores limits of expression

Student erects phallus, but can’t keep it up

By Christine Morrissey

The Human Sexuality club tested the boundaries of freedom of expression on September 29 when they erected an unauthorized eleven-foot papier-mache penis on the Quad during LPC Club Day.

Dan Vallentyne, the student founder of the Human Sexuality club, chained the structure to a bench next to their display table. While the penis was “not anatomically correct” according to Rich Butler, LPC Director of Safety and Security, students paid $1 to have their picture taken with it.

The fake phallus was apparently realistic enough, however, to raise the ire of the LPC administration.

“It crossed the line to obscenity and it violated the student conduct code,” said Karen Halliday, Vice-President of Student Services. “And I wouldn’t have approved it.”

LPC Student Conduct Code says, “students are subject to disciplinary action for engaging in lewd, indecent, or obscene behavior (either through conduct or expression) on campus property or at a campus function.”

According to student government president Chris Conlon, the display came to the attention of the LPC administration after he passed the display while on a campus tour with a group of representatives from the Chancellor’s office from Sacramento.

“It became very apparent that this was not a group trying to raise some money to become a club, but a person with an ulterior motive trying to see what the limit for freedom of expression was on campus,” Conlon said.

When Conlon told Halliday about the display, she wanted it removed, but when Conlon passed this message on, problems ensued.

According to Conlon, Vallentyne informed him that the display was chained to the bench and that he did not have a key. Vallentyne did cover the penis with a sheet.

Vallentyne said he chained the display to the bench because its base was not stable and he was afraid of student vandalism.

Soon after covering the structure, LPC Security Officer Steven Smally arrived to assess the situation. Within minutes he had a pair of bolt cutters and two custodians at the scene.

According to Conlon the following events then took place.

Smally gave Vallentyne ten minutes to remove the display or else he would take it down himself. An argument arose between the two of them, at which time, Vallentyne pulled out a written copy of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on how to define obscenity.

Smally moved in to remove the chain but Vallentyne repeatedly blocked his way. Smally and the two custodians eventually cut the chain but when they tried to remove the penis Vallentyne again intervened.

“It was a tug-of-war between the student and the security officer,” said Rich Butler.

Another student stepped in to help Vallentyne, and in the struggle a portion of the display ripped. Smally and the custodians then carried the penis away.

Vallentyne met with Halliday, Smally, and Butler following the incident.

“Fortunately, it didn’t turn out to be too big of a crisis,” Butler said. “[Vallentyne] was testing his perimeters. There were lessons learned by everyone.”

Halliday said that while there was no physical contact between Vallentyne and Smally, student disciplinary actions are under way.

Vallentyne said he was still unclear as to why the structure was taken down.

The Human Sexuality club is not yet a bona fide club. The Inter-Club Council has not voted to approve or deny the group official club standing.

In order to be come a club, there must be at least eight active members, an advisor, a statement of purpose, and a written constitution. Sarah Thompson is the club’s advisor, but, according to Halliday, paperwork has not been submitted by the club to Student Services for approval.

Vallentyne did not receive approval from either Thompson or Halliday to display the penis at Club Day.

“There was poor communication between me and the advisor,” Vallentyne said.

This is the second time Vallentyne has bypassed Student Services for approval, according to Conlon. Last month, he reportedly posted flyers around campus that had phony approval stamps on them. Apparently, Vallentyne took a flyer off one of the bulletin boards on campus and photocopied its stamp. Then, he pasted the stamp on his flyer and made copies of it. The flyers were unrelated to the Human Sexuality club.

“I don’t have a problem with having a Human Sexuality club, but I have a problem with the founder and the way he does business,” said Conlon.

Mark Tang, the Inter-Club Council Chair, is recommending to the council to deny Human Sexuality official club standing. ICC will decide the fate of Human Sexuality at their next meeting on November 3.

As for the eleven-foot penis itself, Vallentyne is looking into selling the display to a local pornography shop. He did not mention names of prospective buyers.


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

My thanks to Christine Morrissey for one of the most entertaining lead Express stories ever, and my thanks to the Human Sexuality Club for livening up the semester considerably.

The story highlighted a developing problem at LPC and that problem is not a wounded, 11-foot phallus. The problem is the bureaucratization of student (and faculty) life. Per square inch, there is a lot of red tape at our small campus, and people swimming around in it when there are so many better things to do (such as getting a whole lot of papier-mache together and).

The response of the Inter-Club Council to the Human Sexuality Club's event/outrage/happening was that they had not filled out forms and gone to meetings. Contrary to what students may sometimes be told here, forms and meetings do not enhance life-they are, much of the time, life's enemies. I'm afraid some of the very worst habits of some faculty and administrators (particularly that meetings are more important than classes and forms are more important than intellectual exploration) are being unwittingly taught to students and learned all too well.

For my part, I notice how much more efficient the school is at demanding paperwork from me than they are providing my students and me with the relatively simple things we need to teach and learn from each other.

When I hear my colleagues talking in the halls, far too often they are talking about meetings they will be attending, not great teaching tips they have for each other. This is not to say some great teaching does not get done here, just that it has to overcome bureaucratic obstacles to occur. The time faculty spend in meetings and filling out forms is time they are not preparing for classes or working with students.

As a club advisor, I spent a lot of time complying with the school's bureaucratic requirements. I went to a different club's meeting recently. At the meeting, the club spent as much time talking about required forms and who would go to ICC meetings than they did talking about the club's main reason for being.

Let's all remember why we are here—to learn and teach, not to rehearse for death long before its time.

—Mike McGuire, LPC Economics Instructor

 

 

 

 

Let’s all remember why we are here—to learn and teach, not to rehearse for death long before its time.

LPC Home Express Home News Home Archives Contact Us